MAX 2005
It was a great conference, more than 3000 developers together with Flex Flex Flex. We want to say goodbye to all the people we met at MAX, and we hope to see you all again in the next conference. We finally met Mike Nimer, the person behind the cfforms. He is a very nice person. Thanks Mike ;) We also met a lot of people that we only knew by their blog.
The conference overall was good, with a lot of sessions about Flex and great new stuff. I feel that something big is in the oven. This is the beginning of new platform that has a strong foundation and can rule the Web 2.0 (Ajax, can you hear?). It's something that we've been expecting long time and it finally arrives.
So expect more Flex examples from us and less cfforms. We'll be making a slow transition from cfform to Flex 2.0 :) It will be a very smooth ride.
dave
Michael White
João Fernandes
Neil Bailey
Nahuel, this is perfect timing as far as I am concerned. I feel I have taken CFForms as far as I can - or perhaps as far as I want to? - and I am making the slow, leisurely transition to Flex 2 my own self - as I suspect are a good amount of other CF developers.
I am literally, truly shocked that your faithful followers seem to have lost faith so quickly. You led us from the wilderness, the darkness into the light...ok, corny, but you have taught a BUNCH of stuff to a LOT of people who may not have figured it out on their own, myself included. Thank you.
Jason
I've been doing some reading in labs.macromedia.com, do you know any other sources for flex 2?
Before the Flex 2, people are worried about the framework. Now that Flex Framework 2 give me more clearer picture but long term of time investment for Flex is my biggest concern.
Flex builder 2 only supported on windows platform!
How about a development environment which is non-windows platform?
Any plan/changes from MM regarding the Flex 2 Licensing? Especially the "hosting" License?
Thanks
Rick Smith
Maybe Flex is here to stay, but it's going to take a lot more than impressing a bunch of flash geeks (as much as I love being one myself) at a conference how wonderful it is to get it off the ground.
Fortunately for us, ColdFusion is here to stay. ColdFusion is well documented, easy to learn and can be easily considered by companies as a viable alternative/addition to their business internet/intranet capabilities. Flash Forms in CF7 has extended this (not Flex). ASfusion is a CFFORM resource. Other than a feature from time to time, I can't see where Flex fits into the picture amongst the demographic of visitors for this site (CFFORM ColdFusion 7 users), or do I have a misunderstanding who actually visits this site and what knowledge this site offers?
Neil Bailey
I think that not only are your comments arrogant, but rather rude as well. Who are YOU to say that ASFusion is a CFFORM resource? Are you a PAYING member? If Nahuel and Laura decided tomorrow to turn their blog into a study of the various types of window sashes, who the hell are YOU to question what they post, how they post it, or WHY?? If you're interested, you'll continue reading, if not, you'll go somewhere else.
Whether Flex is the real deal or not, as far as this conversation (for lack of a better word) is concerned is irrelevant. This, as far as I am concerned, is about a blogger to write about whatever the hell they want to write about. Those who can keep up, will, those who can't will go somewhere else. However, I don't feel ANYONE has the right to complain.
As with radio/television, don't write the FCC, just change the friggin station........
Rick Smith
Sean Corfield
This will open up the Flash market to millions of developers across the board. I expect to see a lot of ColdFusion developers adopt Flex Builder 2 to create great user interfaces with ColdFusion back ends. I expect to see Java and .NET developers adopt Flex Builder 2 as well.
I think it's great that Nahuel and Laura are excited by Flex. I think Flex is very relevant to ColdFusion developers (in the same way that I think frameworks are very relevant to ColdFusion developers) so it's seems like a win-win situation that AS Fusion will also be covering Flex from now on!
Steve Walker
I am excited about the future of Flex, but it is still just the presentation tier, Coldfusion is still needed as the middle tier. Macromedia has already created a connector to easily interface CF with Flex2. Go to labs.macromedia.com to learn and play.
The retail proce for the "standard" version of Flex 2 is supposed to be $995, but once most employers see the potential, it will be a miniscule cost.
As for the demise of Central, it is true...sort of. During MAX they announced a new project, code named "Apollo", that sounds just like Central only better.
Like many other I have come to rely on the folks at ASFusion for their insights into the extended world of cfforms and I would like to say "thank you". Flex2 is better, so I will look forward to any more knowledge I can glean from your expertise.
Mark Fuqua
I am not 100% sure, but I think CFforms are a small limited subset of Flex 1.5.
Flex is going to be huge, and macromedia has decided to give Coldfusion developers a big head start with the Flex-Coldfusion bridge.
I'm sure looking forward to it.
Mark
Nahuel
I made a post with my response to this heated debate:
http://www.asfusion.com/blog/entry/why-should-a-coldfusion-developer-care
Geof Harries
John Dowdell
If so, might this search be used as a convincer of how many governments not only tolerate, but *rely*, on this transparent local rich-interactivity layer?
http://www.google.com/search?q=inurl%3Agov+filetype%3Aswf
jd/mm